Bitbank vs Luno (2026): fees, trust, coins and availability compared
Advertiser disclosure: some links on this page may be affiliate links, meaning ExchangeCatalogue may earn a commission if you open an account. This never affects the data shown here, which is drawn from our catalogue and compared mechanically. How we make money.
Data refreshed 5 Nov 2026 · Compiled by Charlie Williams
Bitbank is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that provides a secure and user-friendly environment for trading digital assets. It offers competitive trading fees and supports a variety of cryptocurrencies, making it suitable for…
Luno is a cryptocurrency exchange that provides a user-friendly platform for buying, selling, and storing digital currencies. It is designed to cater to both beginners and experienced traders, offering competitive fees and…
Bitbank and Luno are both centralized exchanges. Bitbank (founded 2016, headquartered in Japan) ranks #28 on our trust rank, reports $33.7M in 24-hour trading volume and lists 43 coins across 43 trading pairs. Luno (founded 2013, headquartered in Singapore) ranks #22 on our trust rank, reports $10.6M in 24-hour trading volume and lists 50 coins across 101 trading pairs.
Verdict at a glance
Bitbank leads on 24h trading volume.
Luno leads on coins listed, trading pairs, track record and country availability.
Level on trust score and licences.
Scored on 7 measurable dimensions where both exchanges have verified data. Dimensions missing for either side are excluded rather than guessed. This is a data summary, not a recommendation.
Bitbank vs Luno: side-by-side data
Criteria
Bitbank
Luno
Trust score
8 / 10
8 / 10
Trust rank
#28
#22
24h trading volume
$33.7M
$10.6M
Coins listed
43
50
Trading pairs
43
101
Founded
2016
2013
Headquarters
Japan
Singapore
Exchange type
Centralized (CEX)
Centralized (CEX)
Countries available
1 countries
6 countries
Licences / registrations
Financial Services Agency (JFSA) - Japan
Securities Commission Malaysia (SC), DAX registration - Malaysia
Trading types
Spot
Spot
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value where a direction is objectively better (e.g. more licences, lower fees). "Not verified" means the field is not yet in our catalogue for that exchange — we never fill gaps with estimates.
Pros
Bitbank
High Security Standards
User-Friendly Interface
Competitive Trading Fees
Wide Range of Supported Cryptocurrencies
Advanced Trading Features
Luno
User-friendly interface
Competitive fees
Strong security measures
Wide range of supported cryptocurrencies
Educational resources available
Country availability: Bitbank vs Luno
Only Bitbank (1): Japan.
Only Luno (6): Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, Singapore, South Africa, Uganda.
Availability reflects the countries each exchange declares it serves. Local rules change; confirm on the exchange's own site before signing up.
Bitbank vs Luno: common questions
Which is bigger by trading volume, Bitbank or Luno?
Bitbank reports the higher 24-hour trading volume ($33.7M vs $10.6M), based on the latest market data in our catalogue.
Which lists more coins, Bitbank or Luno?
Luno lists more coins: 43 at Bitbank versus 50 at Luno.
Which has the higher trust score, Bitbank or Luno?
Bitbank has the higher trust score (8 / 10 vs 8 / 10). The score reflects liquidity, scale of operations and cyber-security signals as tracked in our catalogue.
Which is older, Bitbank or Luno?
Luno is the older of the two, founded in 2013; Bitbank was founded in 2016.
Are Bitbank and Luno available in the same countries?
They overlap in 0 countries. Bitbank is additionally available in 1 countries (Japan) and Luno in 6 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, Singapore, South Africa, Uganda).
Risk warning: cryptoassets are highly volatile and largely unregulated in many jurisdictions. You may lose the entire amount you deposit. Nothing on this page is financial advice; check availability and terms with the exchange before opening an account. Full risk disclosure.
We use cookies to make ExchangeCatalogue run smoothly and improve your experience.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.