Bitstamp vs WhiteBIT (2026): fees, trust, coins and availability compared
Advertiser disclosure: some links on this page may be affiliate links, meaning ExchangeCatalogue may earn a commission if you open an account. This never affects the data shown here, which is drawn from our catalogue and compared mechanically. How we make money.
Data refreshed 5 Nov 2026 · Compiled by Charlie Williams
Bitstamp is a well-established cryptocurrency exchange known for its user-friendly interface and robust security measures. It provides a range of trading options with competitive fees, making it suitable for both beginners and…
WhiteBIT is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that provides a secure and user-friendly environment for trading digital assets. It offers competitive trading fees and supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies, making it suitable…
Bitstamp and WhiteBIT are both centralized exchanges. Bitstamp (founded 2011, headquartered in Luxembourg) ranks #7 on our trust rank, reports $370.3M in 24-hour trading volume and lists 96 coins across 186 trading pairs. WhiteBIT (founded 2018, headquartered in Lithuania) ranks #29 on our trust rank, reports $2.18B in 24-hour trading volume and lists 325 coins across 784 trading pairs. The two overlap in 49 countries; Bitstamp is available in 194 countries where WhiteBIT is not, and WhiteBIT in 0 where Bitstamp is not.
Verdict at a glance
Bitstamp leads on trust score, track record, country availability and licences.
WhiteBIT leads on 24h trading volume, coins listed and trading pairs.
Scored on 7 measurable dimensions where both exchanges have verified data. Dimensions missing for either side are excluded rather than guessed. This is a data summary, not a recommendation.
Bitstamp vs WhiteBIT: side-by-side data
Criteria
Bitstamp
WhiteBIT
Trust score
9 / 10
8 / 10
Trust rank
#7
#29
24h trading volume
$370.3M
$2.18B
Coins listed
96
325
Trading pairs
186
784
Founded
2011
2018
Headquarters
Luxembourg
Lithuania
Exchange type
Centralized (CEX)
Centralized (CEX)
Countries available
243 countries
49 countries
Licences / registrations
Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), MiCA licence - Luxembourg, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), cryptoasset registration - United Kingdom, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) - Singapore
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
Trading types
Spot
Derivatives, Spot
Highlighted cells mark the stronger value where a direction is objectively better (e.g. more licences, lower fees). "Not verified" means the field is not yet in our catalogue for that exchange — we never fill gaps with estimates.
Pros
Bitstamp
Low Trading Fees
High Security Standards
User-Friendly Interface
Wide Range of Supported Cryptocurrencies
Reliable Customer Support
WhiteBIT
- High Security Standards
User-Friendly Interface
Wide Range of Supported Cryptocurrencies
Competitive Trading Fees
Advanced Trading Features
Country availability: Bitstamp vs WhiteBIT
Available at both (49): Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa and 9 more.
Only Bitstamp (194): Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Aruba, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bouvet Island, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands and 169 more.
Availability reflects the countries each exchange declares it serves. Local rules change; confirm on the exchange's own site before signing up.
Bitstamp vs WhiteBIT: common questions
Which is bigger by trading volume, Bitstamp or WhiteBIT?
WhiteBIT reports the higher 24-hour trading volume ($370.3M vs $2.18B), based on the latest market data in our catalogue.
Which lists more coins, Bitstamp or WhiteBIT?
WhiteBIT lists more coins: 96 at Bitstamp versus 325 at WhiteBIT.
Which has the higher trust score, Bitstamp or WhiteBIT?
Bitstamp has the higher trust score (9 / 10 vs 8 / 10). The score reflects liquidity, scale of operations and cyber-security signals as tracked in our catalogue.
Which is older, Bitstamp or WhiteBIT?
Bitstamp is the older of the two, founded in 2011; WhiteBIT was founded in 2018.
Are Bitstamp and WhiteBIT available in the same countries?
They overlap in 49 countries. Bitstamp is additionally available in 194 countries (Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda and 188 more) and WhiteBIT in 0 countries ().
Risk warning: cryptoassets are highly volatile and largely unregulated in many jurisdictions. You may lose the entire amount you deposit. Nothing on this page is financial advice; check availability and terms with the exchange before opening an account. Full risk disclosure.
We use cookies to make ExchangeCatalogue run smoothly and improve your experience.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.